Over the last several years law. A Condition C special determination is a determination by the Director General as to whether the taking of disciplinary proceedings against a Condition C person in respect of alleged gross misconduct would be reasonable and proportionate having regard to. HMCIC or an inspector of constabulary nominated by HMCIC. 41.(1)The person conducting or chairing the misconduct proceedings must determine the procedure at those proceedings and, in so far as it is set out in these Regulations, must determine it in accordance with these Regulations. where the officer concerned was a special constable at the relevant time, the police force maintained for the police area for which the officer was appointed at that time;; (i)for the definition of police officer, except in its application to regulations 4, 7 and 8, there were substituted. (2)This paragraph applies to a case where, (a)it is a case in respect of which the duty referred to in regulation 23(9)(a) arises, and. (3)Condition A is that P ceased to be a police officer after the allegation first came to the attention of a relevant body. 52.(1)The appropriate authority must specify a date for the accelerated misconduct hearing which must be not less than 10 and not more than 15 working days after the date on which notice is given under regulation 51(1) and must as soon as practicable, (a)notify the officer concerned and the person conducting or chairing the accelerated misconduct hearing of the date, time and place of that hearing, and. (6)Subject to paragraph (5), a misconduct pre-hearing must be in private. (b)the complainant and any interested person, in any case to which regulation 40 applies. (a)on receipt of any representations under paragraph (7); (b)if there has been no previous review, before the end of 4 weeks beginning with the first working day after the suspension; (i)when it becomes aware that circumstances relevant to the suspension conditions may have changed (whether by means of representations made under paragraph (7)(b) or otherwise), or. 32. a person appointed by the local policing body, selected on a fair and transparent basis from a list of candidates maintained by the local policing body for the purpose of these Regulations. i did get a written warning (cop was really nice and dropped it from a ticket cuz he was . (9)Where the circumstances prescribed in paragraph (8) apply, the Director General may be represented by a relevant lawyer. the local policing body, where the person in relation to whom the objection is made was appointed by that body, or, the appropriate authority in all other cases, and. (5)This paragraph applies where a final written warning was in force on the date of the severity assessment under regulation 14(1) of these Regulations or under regulation 16 of the Complaints and Misconduct Regulations. (i)there is a case to answer in respect of gross misconduct or there is no case to answer; (ii)where the investigators opinion is that there is no such case to answer, there may nevertheless have been a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour that would have justified the bringing of disciplinary proceedings had the officer still been serving.; (i)for would amount to neither misconduct nor, there were substituted would not amount to; (ii)in sub-paragraph (a), for it; there were substituted it, and; (iii)sub-paragraph (c), and and before it were omitted; (c)in paragraphs (6) and (7), misconduct or were omitted. (9)Subject to paragraph (10)(b) and (11), the misconduct hearing must take place before the end of 30 working days beginning with the date of the misconduct pre-hearing. (5)When assessing the public interest for the purposes of paragraph (2)(c), the matters which the Director General must take into account are. the conduct that is the subject matter of the case and how that conduct is alleged to amount to gross misconduct, as set out in the notice given in accordance with regulation 51(2). where the person conducting or chairing the misconduct proceedings decides the conduct of the officer concerned amounts to misconduct, in accordance with regulation 41(15). made at the accelerated misconduct hearing. in sub-paragraph (h), after 18(1), there were inserted , 20A(2). (c)the effect of paragraphs (6) to (9) of this regulation. consult each of the officers concerned as regards the timing of the misconduct pre-hearing, and. A citation or ticket is a summons issued by law enforcement to somebody breaking traffic laws. ), or, the investigation of a complaint to which paragraph 19A of that Schedule (special procedure where investigation relates to police officer or special constable)(, paragraph 18 or 19 of Schedule 3 to the 2002 Act (directed and independent investigations) applied, or, paragraph 16 of Schedule 3 to the 2002 Act (investigations by the appropriate authority on its own behalf) applied and in relation to which the Director General. accompany the officer to any interview, meeting or hearing which forms part of any proceedings under these Regulations. (2)Where the officer concerned informs the person conducting or chairing the accelerated misconduct hearing in advance that the officer is unable to attend on grounds which the person conducting or chairing the hearing considers reasonable, that person may allow the officer to participate in the hearing by video link or other means. (2)Before referring a case to misconduct proceedings or an accelerated misconduct hearing, the appropriate authority must decide whether misconduct proceedings or an accelerated misconduct hearing would prejudice any criminal proceedings. fall before the end of the period of 5 working days beginning with the first working day after the day specified by the investigator. the finding of the person or persons conducting the accelerated misconduct hearing; was entitled to attend to make representations under regulation 58(1), and. There is provision for a matter to be referred to be dealt with under this process by the appropriate authority when making a severity assessment (under regulation 14(4)) or, following an investigation, under regulation 23(8) and by a person or persons conducting misconduct proceedings, under regulation 42(1)(b). the disciplinary proceedings would not be the first disciplinary proceedings to be taken against P in respect of the alleged gross misconduct unless they result from a re-investigation of the allegation (whether carried out under these Regulations or under the2002 Act) that begins not later than 12 months after the date on which P ceased to be a police officer. (a)advise the officer concerned throughout the proceedings under these Regulations; (b)represent the officer at the misconduct proceedings or accelerated misconduct hearing or appeal meeting, unless the officer has the right to be legally represented and chooses to be so represented; (c)make representations to the appropriate authority concerning any aspect of the proceedings under these Regulations, and. (17)At misconduct proceedings conducted by a panel, any decision must be based on a majority but must not indicate whether it was taken unanimously or by a majority. A copy of this publication can be obtained from the College of Policing. (ii)any arguments on points of law they wish to be considered by the person or persons conducting the accelerated misconduct hearing; (d)a copy of any document they intend to rely on at the accelerated misconduct hearing. the officer complies with regulation 31(2) and (3); the expiry of the 15 working day period referred to in regulation 31(1)(a), if the officer has not complied with regulation 31(2) and (3) within that period, or. (d)where the investigators opinion under sub-paragraph (c) is that there is no case to answer, indicate the investigators opinion as to whether the matter should be referred to be dealt with under the Performance Regulations or the reflective practice review process. (2)The investigator must, as part of the investigation, consider any such statement or document and must make a record of having received it. This site additionally contains content derived from EUR-Lex, reused under the terms of the Commission Decision 2011/833/EU on the reuse of documents from the EU institutions. This process does not amount to disciplinary proceedings, as defined in regulation 2(1). Once a police officer determines that your driver is in violation of a traffic or safety law, they can give a warning or a citation. 60.(1)This regulation applies in the case of an accelerated misconduct hearing arising from the investigation of a, (a)conduct matter under Schedule 3 to the2002 Act(handling of complaints and conduct matters etc. Any period of time specified in this Part in relation to an accelerated misconduct hearing may be reduced by agreement between the appropriate authority, the officer concerned, where the Director General is presenting the case, the Director General, and the person conducting or chairing the accelerated misconduct hearing. (6)The Director General must give notification in writing of a Condition C special determination and the consequences under Schedule 3 to the 2002 Act of the determination to the persons mentioned in paragraph (1).. (2)Where the Director General so attends the accelerated misconduct hearing. a person exercising duties of the Commissioner of Police for the City of London in accordance with section 25 of the City of London Police Act 1839(9); allegation means an allegation relating to a complaint, conduct matter or practice requiring improvement; appeal meeting means a meeting held in accordance with regulation 46; appropriate authority means, subject to regulation 26(3). 19.(1)Where an investigation is not completed within a relevant period, the appropriate authority must, subject to paragraph (3), provide as soon as practicable the following information in writing to the local policing body. that, although those conditions are satisfied, the circumstances are such as to make such certification inappropriate. Section 63(3)(a) was substituted by paragraph 78(3) of Schedule 4 to the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 (c. 15) and amended by paragraph 6(2) of Schedule 22 to the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008, sections 123(4) and 133(2) of the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 (c. 12) and section 10(3)(b) of the Policing and Crime Act 2009 (c. 26). (2)Subject to paragraph (4), where a date and time is specified under paragraph (1) and, (a)the officer concerned or their police friend will not be available, and. in the light of their conclusions under paragraph (i), may determine that it is appropriate to place less weight on those circumstances. an employee of the Common Council of the City of London who is under the direction and control of a chief officer; practice requiring improvement means underperformance or conduct not amounting to misconduct or gross misconduct, which falls short of the expectations of the public and the police service as set out in the Code of Ethics issued by the College of Policing under section 39A of the Police Act 1996 (codes of practice for chief officers)(23); pre-commencement allegation means an allegation against a police officer which came to the attention of a local policing body or a chief officer of police before 1st February 2020; proposed witness means a witness whose attendance at the misconduct proceedings the officer concerned or the appropriate authority, as the case may be, wishes to request of the person conducting or chairing those proceedings; reflective practice review process means the process set out in Part 6; relevant lawyer has the meaning given to it by section 84(4) of the 1996 Act (representation etc. (5)Paragraph (1) does not apply in a case where the Director General has made a decision under regulation 24(1) to present a case. (a)the certificate issued under regulation 49(4) or under one of the provisions mentioned in regulation 49(7); (b)any statement the officer may have made to the investigator during the course of the investigation, and, (i)the investigators report or such parts of that report as relate to the officer (together with any document attached to or referred to in that report as relates to the officer), and, (2)The notice given under paragraph (1) must, (a)describe the conduct that is the subject matter of the case and how that conduct is alleged to amount to gross misconduct, and. Police officers act with self-control and tolerance, treating members of the public and colleagues with respect and courtesy. 69.(1)The reviewer must, following completion of the fact-finding stage, invite the participating officer to attend a reflective practice review discussion. Sections 88A and 88G were inserted by Schedule 8 to the 2017 Act. (d)if so, and subject to paragraph (10), what form the misconduct proceedings should take. Tickets and citations are documents that charge you with a violation of traffic law. Regulation 22 is to be read as if conducting or were omitted. (2)This paragraph applies in a case where misconduct proceedings have been delayed by virtue of regulation 10(3) and the appropriate authority has certified the case as one where the special conditions are satisfied following a determination made under regulation 49(3). (2)Where the appropriate authority assesses that the conduct, if proved, would amount to neither misconduct nor gross misconduct, it must assess whether. (3)The investigator or a nominated person must attend the misconduct proceedings on the request of the person conducting or chairing those proceedings to answer questions. (4)Where a witness who is or may be a witness in any criminal proceedings is to be or may be asked to attend misconduct proceedings, the appropriate authority must consult the relevant prosecutor (and when doing so must inform the prosecutor of the names and addresses of all such witnesses) before making its decision under paragraph (2). notify the officer concerned and the person conducting or chairing the accelerated misconduct hearing of the date, time and place of that hearing, and. 46.(1)This regulation applies where the officer concerned requests a meeting in the written notice of appeal under regulation 45(3). (3)In a case where the misconduct proceedings have been delayed by virtue of regulation 10(3), as soon as practicable after, (a)the appropriate authority considers that such proceedings would no longer prejudice any criminal proceedings, or. (a)unless they have an appropriate level of knowledge, skills and experience to plan and manage the investigation; (c)if they work, directly or indirectly, under the management of the officer concerned, or, (d)in a case where the officer concerned is a senior officer, if they are. (e)the Director Generals relevant lawyer, where the Director General is presenting the case or would be entitled to attend the misconduct hearing under regulation 38(1). a copy of any such document, where it has not already been supplied. an appeal from misconduct proceedings or from an accelerated misconduct hearing under the Police Appeals Tribunals Rules 2020(15), but, for the purposes of the following provisions, disciplinary proceedings only includes misconduct proceedings mentioned in paragraph (a) and a hearing mentioned in paragraph (b) of this definition. The Secretary of State makes the following Regulations, in exercise of the powers conferred by sections 50(1), (2)(e) and (f), (2A), (3), (3A) to (3G), (4) and (7), 51(1), (2)(b), (2)(ba) and (c), (2A) to (2H), (3A) and (4), 84(1) to (6), 88A(2)(b) and 88G(1)(b) of the Police Act 1996(1), section 36(1(a) and (b) of, and paragraph 29 of Schedule 3 to, the Police Reform Act 2002(2) and section 29(7) of the Policing and Crime Act 2017(3). the officer concerned or the officers police friend may provide any relevant documents to the investigator. (6)In paragraph (5), protected disclosure has the meaning given by section 43A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (meaning of protected disclosure)(27). only asked coz he wrote $167 beside it. Police officers behave in a manner which does not discredit the police service or undermine public confidence in it, whether on or off duty. A verbal warning and a written warning are . (b)notify the officer concerned of the effect of regulation 8(1) to (3) in relation to an accelerated misconduct hearing. (3)Having considered any representations received under regulations 33(8)(f), 36(3) and 36(5), the person conducting or chairing the misconduct proceedings may. in paragraph (1)(a), misconduct or were omitted; in sub-paragraph (a), for the words from may to the end, there were substituted must take no further action against the officer concerned,; in sub-paragraph (b)(i), , indicating whether any action will be taken under paragraph (2)(a) were omitted; for the panel of persons must comprise there were substituted where the case is referred to a misconduct hearing, that hearing must be conducted by a panel of three persons, comprising; in sub-paragraph (b), after officer concerned there were inserted was at the relevant time; in paragraph (5), for is a senior officer there were substituted was a senior officer at the relevant time. request a response to any such question from the officer concerned within a specified period. under regulation 23 a case is referred to a misconduct hearing. (5)Subject to the harm test and except where paragraph (6) applies by virtue of sub-paragraph (d) of that paragraph, where the written terms of reference are given under paragraph (2) and those terms are revised by the investigator, the investigator must as soon as practicable give the officer concerned the revised terms of reference. ANSWER: A written traffic ticket, with "Massachusetts Uniform Citation" at the top is the standard ticket issued by local and State Police. Where the investigator is satisfied that, having regard to the circumstances of the officer concerned, it would be unreasonable to require the officer to attend an interview, the investigator may cause the officer concerned to be given a written notice of enquiry. (a)where the case is referred to a misconduct meeting, that meeting must be conducted by a person appointed by the appropriate authority in accordance with paragraph (3) who is not an interested party; (b)where the case is referred to a misconduct hearing, that hearing must be conducted by a panel of three persons appointed in accordance with paragraph (4). (3)Where, on the date of the severity assessment under regulation 14(1) of these Regulations or under regulation 16 of the Complaints and Misconduct Regulations, the officer concerned had a final written warning in force, a final written warning must not be given. A notice of enquiry given under paragraph (1) must, state any question the investigator wishes to ask the officer concerned, and. Police officers abide by police regulations, force policies and lawful orders. provided under regulation 53(3) or (5), or. (4)A case to which paragraph 16, 18 or 19 of Schedule 3 to the2002 Act(investigations) applied may only be withdrawn, (a)on the direction of the Director General, following consultation with the appropriate authority, in a case where the Director General, (i)made a recommendation under paragraph 25(4C)(c) of that Schedule (duties with respect to disciplinary proceedings) which the appropriate authority accepted, or, (ii)gave a direction under paragraph 23(5A)(e) or paragraph 27(4)(a) of that Schedule to bring disciplinary proceedings, or. 1965/536) to remove the prohibition on special constables giving notice of their retirement whilst suspended or retiring pursuant to a notice given before they were suspended. If you get more than a few warnings in one jurisdiction, you will stop getting warnings. These Regulations are to be read as if regulation 11 were omitted. (2)Subject to regulation 49, on receipt of a report submitted under paragraph 22 of Schedule 3 to the2002 Act(final reports on investigations)(39), in making a determination under paragraph 24(6) of that Schedule (action in response to an investigation report)(40) as to what action to take in respect of matters dealt with in that report, the appropriate authority must, as soon as practicable determine. (2)The person conducting or chairing the misconduct meeting may extend the period specified in paragraph (1) where they consider that it would be in the interests of justice to do so. Access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item from this tab. a statement of the investigators belief and the grounds for it, and. Section 29(7)(a) of the Policing and Crime Act 2017 provides that regulations made under section 50(1A) and 51(2B) of the 1996 Act, as inserted by section 29(2) and (3) of the 2017 Act, may not make provision in relation to a person who ceases to be a police officer (within the meaning of these Regulations) before the coming into force of section 29(2) and (3) of the 2017 Act. in relation to an officer who was a member of a police force of the rank of chief inspector or below at the relevant time, the Police Federation of England and Wales; in relation to an officer who was a member of a police force of the rank of superintendent or chief superintendent at the relevant time, the Police Superintendents Association, and.